Deconstruct arguments, detect cognitive biases, map logical structures, and evaluate evidence credibility in seconds. Built for researchers, educators, and analytical professionals.
Each tool is powered by proprietary NLP models trained on peer-reviewed logic, philosophy, and cognitive science literature.
Instantly identifies 47 common formal and informal fallacies in text, with precise citations and remediation suggestions.
Real-time AnalysisVisualizes premises, conclusions, and supporting evidence in interactive Toulmin-style diagrams.
Visual LogicDetects confirmation bias, framing effects, and hidden assumptions that skew reasoning or data interpretation.
Cognitive ScienceGrades source reliability, methodological rigor, and citation density using academic benchmarking protocols.
Academic StandardProduces targeted probing questions to challenge weak reasoning, explore counterarguments, and deepen inquiry.
PedagogicalFrom raw text to structured insight in four seamless steps.
Paste an article, essay, debate transcript, or research abstract into the analyzer.
Our engine extracts claims, evidence, logical connectors, and rhetorical patterns.
Checks against verified knowledge graphs, peer-reviewed standards, and bias databases.
Receive a visual breakdown, credibility score, and step-by-step reasoning improvements.
Paste a short argument or claim below to see how our tools break it down.
Adapted for classrooms, research labs, newsrooms, and corporate strategy teams.
Teach logical reasoning, automate essay feedback, and train students to spot flawed arguments in real-time.
Fact-check claims, verify source credibility, and ensure balanced reporting before publication.
Evaluate literature quality, identify confirmation bias in datasets, and strengthen methodological rigor.
Stress-test business proposals, detect groupthink, and refine decision-making frameworks.
Our model achieves 94.2% precision on validated logic datasets. It flags probable fallacies with confidence scores and always provides source citations so you can verify the classification.
Absolutely. The tools are designed to complement, not replace, peer review. Many universities use Aevum's Critical Thinking suite for writing centers and philosophy departments.
No. All analysis runs in isolated sessions. Text is processed in memory and discarded immediately. We do not log, store, or repurpose user inputs for model training.
You can paste plain text, upload .docx/.pdf/.txt files, or input URLs. The engine automatically extracts and parses structured arguments from all supported formats.
Free access for students and educators. Unlimited analysis for verified academic accounts.